A review of the lease register and the paper copies kept by tenants finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the registry at North Quay. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: several older leases name a quay stair that has since been renumbered.
The the lease register and the paper copies kept by tenants lists 47 renewal clauses with a notice date in both copies; the previous window lists 42. Tomas Reed checked both against time-stamped route logs checked against field visits. The source was checked against a second copy held by Tessa Burn. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Landlords point to the registry entry. Tenants say the notice reached the wrong doorway after the quay was renumbered. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide whether a tenant received notice when the address on an old lease no longer matches the street board.
The clerk closes the docket and gives the next review a fresh scope. The board closed this docket after it approved a narrower exception with an appeal route. The next window starts with a fresh record.
