A review of the signed minutes and the clerk’s amendment register finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the public table in Ferry House. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: a margin correction added after the final reading of a ferry motion.
The the signed minutes and the clerk’s amendment register lists 52 motions with a dated disposition; the previous window lists 49. Marek Stone checked both against posted terms set beside signed receipts and final invoices. The source was checked against a second copy held by Oren Lyle. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
One copy treats the change as a new service rule. The clerk says the vote kept the old rule and added a date for the trial. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide whether a late amendment changed a ferry schedule or only clarified its start date.
The clerk matches the question to the original register and its last amendment. The Year fifth, high summer window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The council will compare the amendment register with the recording made during the vote.
