A review of lease renewal notices and tenants’ dated receipt copies finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the tenant desk at Alder Court. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: some stair numbers changed before the lease register was updated.
The lease renewal notices and tenants’ dated receipt copies lists 96 renewals with a delivery receipt attached; the previous window lists 96. Marek Stone checked both against posted terms set beside signed receipts and final invoices. The source was checked against a second copy held by Rhea Mint. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Owners rely on the registered address. Tenants say a corrected map came after the notice period began. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a household can challenge a notice delivered to an old stair number.
The clerk closes the docket and gives the next review a fresh scope. The board closed this docket after it retained the existing rule and published the reason for doing so. The next window starts with a fresh record.
