A review of the translation rota and the first-print date on each notice finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the notice desk at Old Bell Square. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: a draft date now travels with the notice request.
The the translation rota and the first-print date on each notice lists 68 hearing notices translated before the meeting date; the previous window lists 66. Lina Vale checked both against service rosters compared with the hours a resident can actually reach a desk. The source was checked against a second copy held by Sami Orr. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Clerks count a notice when the final date is set. Interpreters say a draft date is needed before residents can arrange work and travel. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how early residents can plan around a hearing when the meeting date is still tentative.
Anew review window opens with a dated question and a named clerk. The Year fifth, high summer window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The desk will compare translation requests with the dates printed on the next twelve notices.
