A review of the stone-load register and repair crew’s closure notes finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the North Span over Mill Channel. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: a new seam is visible near the north bearing after a wet week.
The the stone-load register and repair crew’s closure notes lists 32 heavy crossings made under the temporary limit; the previous window lists 30. Lina Vale checked both against service rosters compared with the hours a resident can actually reach a desk. The source was checked against a second copy held by Rell Doran. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Carriers say the detour adds a second toll. The inspector says the seam needs one measured load before the limit changes. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide whether the span can carry ordinary freight while a bearing stone is reset.
The responsible board publishes two options with a cost and end date for each. The Year second, cold harbor window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. Masons will record a test load after the new bearing stone is seated.
