A review of translated notices and the interpreter booking rota finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the public board in Lower Market Square. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the first copy is printed before the interpreter rota is complete.
The translated notices and the interpreter booking rota lists 78 public meetings with a language request confirmed before the notice date; the previous window lists 78. Lina Vale checked both against service rosters compared with the hours a resident can actually reach a desk. The source was checked against a second copy held by Lina Vale. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Clerks point to a copy on the board. Residents ask whether the copy reached them before they had to arrange work and travel. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide whether a translated notice can be useful when it arrives after the meeting date is chosen.
The clerk matches the question to the original register and its last amendment. The Year fourth, river rise window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The board will compare translation dates with the first public notice date.
