Start with grant applications, assessor notes and household appeal letters. It is the source used to decide whether urgent repairs are assessed in the order residents need them; it is not the decision itself. The rule only works if the source describes conditions at the low streets below West Wall.
Known: the current file counts 49 homes with a completed repair visit, compared with 43 in the prior window. The responsible board publishes two options with a cost and end date for each. The entries have dates and a named clerk.
Disputed: The office says street grouping saves travel time. Residents with older damage reports say the schedule hides how long they have waited. One side emphasizes the posted total; the other points to the visit schedule groups houses by street rather than by damage report date.
Why it matters: the decision determines which residents can rely on the service and which staff must carry out the change. The file does not settle that by itself.
Next: The Year fourth, high summer window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The ward will publish wait time beside each repair category.
