A review of the joint fee schedule and seller receipts from both towns finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the common market at Three Counties Gate. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one town applies a cleaning fee before the market bell.
The the joint fee schedule and seller receipts from both towns lists 46 stalls charged the same listed rate on both sides; the previous window lists 45. Marek Stone checked both against posted terms set beside signed receipts and final invoices. The source was checked against a second copy held by Lena Orr. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The town office calls cleaning a public service. Sellers ask that it appear beside the rate, not below it. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how sellers compare a posted stall fee when one side includes cleaning.
Asecond office checks the count and records any difference in method. The Year third, high summer window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The market council will post the full amount for one comparison period.
